lifestream.binaryisdeath.de http://sweetcron.binaryisdeath.de/feed en-us http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Sweetcron axel.quack@binaryisdeath.de PlayStation Game Runners – Next Level Street Gaming http://sweetcron.binaryisdeath.de/items/view/4673 PlayStation Game Runners is an experimental project where PlayStation, members of the public and young people from diverse backgrounds come together to create social games. We at PlayStation believe that the best games are played as a group. The project has been developed by PlayStation and Hide & Seek with a team of eight initial Game Runners who have been picked to train as game designers and work to make the games relevant.

There are three games in development: Flags, Blocks and Hoops. The games are in prototype stage and there will be a series of playtests to develop the games. You can get involved in PlayStation Game Runners, where you can learn about the different games, meet the Game Runners and get involved. Fans are invited to comment on the games and support The Game Runners. The most popular game – as decided by the fans – will be selected and put forward into development and then put into action at a live event to be announced, where fans can try out the game for real. Details of the three games in development: Hoops is an urban adventure that takes the backyard past-time of shooting hoops to an intense new level. Played out across a large area, teams of eight must work together to discover hidden stashes of balls, find shooting points, and then get the ball through the hoop. There are many hoops hidden around the streets, so be on the look-out… Sometimes the player will be able to shoot the hoop in one throw; sometimes, the team will have to work together to pass the ball from the shooting point to the hoop. Many teams play simultaneously, so there are lots of chances for interceptions. This is a game where teamwork, communication and a good throwing arm are key… Blocks is a three-dimensional game of strategy and precision movement. Two opposing players take it in turns to place the blocks in a 2 x 2 tower. Every face of the block has a PlayStation symbol on it. When a player places a block, the symbols on all touching faces must match. Here’s the tricky bit: all the blocks are a little bit uneven, and so stacking a high tower gets harder and harder. The player who lets the tower topple, or who runs out of time to make a move, loses the game. You’ll need a logical mind and a steady hand to triumph! Flags is Noughts and Crosses transformed into a fun, social team game. Played on a 3 x 3 grid with a flag in the centre of each square, teams of three compete against one another to make a winning row. Players capture a flag by out-numbering their opponents on the square for a full ten-count. If you don’t get to ten, you don’t raise the flag… Flags begins as a fun and chaotic game. but players soon develop complex tactics to dominate squares. You’ll need great communication, quick thinking and fast movement if you want to succeed… Check out Game Runners on facebook to find out more and vote for your favourite.

]]>
Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16:26:00 +0200 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SCEEBlog/~3/W24057lzcpo/
Offizielle ‘Twitter’-Anwendung für das iPad erreicht den App Store http://sweetcron.binaryisdeath.de/items/view/4671 Der Kurzmitteilungsdienst ‘Twitter’ kaufte im April 2010 die App-Store-Anwendung ‘Tweetie 2′ von Loren Brichter. Seit dem 19. Mai ist die iPhone-App unter dem Namen ‘Twitter‘ (kostenlos; App Store-Link) im App Store verfügbar; heute folgt die Umstellung auf eine ‘universal’ Anwendung, die den Webservice über ein natives iOS-Programm am iPad benutzbar macht. Durch ein abermals verändertes Software-Design muss sich auch bei dieser Veröffentlichung die Konkurrenz kräftig anschnallen. TechCrunch titelt: “Twitter Just Killed Something Else: Their Own Website. Twitter For iPad Is That Good.” und beschreibt damit ‘verschiebbare Fensterelemente’, die man so noch in keiner populären iPad-Anwendung gesehen hat. Auf den mittlerweile von Twitter bezahlten Loren Brichter, der auch in diesen Programmcode seine Finger steckte, fällt bekanntlich das ‘Pull-to-Refresh’-Konzept. Dabei ließ sich der Twitter-Zeitstrahl aktualisierten, wenn man sich an die oberste Fenster-Position klammerte. Viele Programme kopierten diese Software-Aufmachung. Als Facebook (kostenlos; App Store-Link) ‘Pull-to-Refresh’ integrierte, wurde sich anschließend kräftig für die Leihgabe entschuldigt. Hier noch zwei oder drei Tricks zur vereinfachten Bedienung. Allen iPad-Besitzern ist ein Ausprobieren damit (hoffentlich) nahegelegt worden. Streicht man mit zwei Fingern über einen Tweet, öffnet sich der Gesprächsverlauf Spreizt man zwei Finger auseinander, öffnet sich das Twitter-Profil Tweets ohne Links öffnen in der rechten Randspalte zusätzliche Profil-Informationen Ein langer Fingerdruck auf den ‘Messages’-Knopf in der linken Seitenleiste enthüllt eine Schnellansicht Um das komplett rechte Fenster wieder loszuwerden, hilft nur ein Wechsel in den Standard-Kategorien (Timeline, Mentions, etc.) Kurzer Epilog: Twitter informierte seine Nutzer in der letzten Nacht per E-Mail über die Umstellung zur OAuth-Autorisierung und der Einführung eines eigenen Kurz-URL-Dienstes mit der Adresse t.co. -> App Store-Link via blog.twitter.com

]]>
Thu, 02 Sep 2010 09:05:00 +0200 http://rss.feedsportal.com/c/32789/f/525640/s/d58189b/l/0L0Siphoneblog0Bde0C20A10A0C0A90C0A20Coffizielle0Etwitter0Eanwendung0Efur0Edas0Eipad0Eerreicht0Eden0Eapp0Estore0C/story01.htm
Nice! Will be done 2013 not 2014. RT @jkleske: Video: Future of Screen Technology (via tigs) <a href="http://bit.ly/dwdblP" rel="external">http://bit.ly/dwdblP</a> http://sweetcron.binaryisdeath.de/items/view/4667 Thu, 02 Sep 2010 08:20:00 +0200 http://twitter.com/guttertec/statuses/22776543679 RT @aronwoost: Very interesting new navigation concepts. Finally some new ipad pattern? #twitter #for #iPad http://sweetcron.binaryisdeath.de/items/view/4668 Thu, 02 Sep 2010 08:18:00 +0200 http://twitter.com/guttertec/statuses/22776446486 The Filtering For Relevance Matrix http://sweetcron.binaryisdeath.de/items/view/4669 After looking at the different approaches to filtering for Relevance, I have been seeking a way to map them visually. There are many different startups competing in this space along with the giants, and a way to map them in a matrix would help us see the big picture of how the battle for relevance is evolving on the social web. What are the fundamental ways in which these approaches and startups differ? These could form the axis around which we can then proceed to map them. The Popular – Personalized Axis Filtering either works by showing us the most popular stuff being shared online, or by understanding our individual preferences and surfacing personalized content. Thus, we have the following axis:

The Serendipity – Search Axis You either search for content or you see it serendipitously without seeking anything specific. Search is actively initiated by the user and is goal-driven, while serendipitous discovery is gifted with the user being passive at the receiving end. This gives us our second axis:

The Filtering for Relevance Matrix (FORMAT) We combine these two axes to form the backbone of our visualization. We then place different services within our matrix as per their core filtering approach. The result is the Filtering FOR Relevance Matrix (FORMAT) as seen below:  

Let us now look at each quadrant closely. Popular – Search Quadrant This is the simplest and oldest of all. Search powered by algorithms to surface most popular content online. This also includes other Twitter search services like Topsy. These services are powered by algorithms such as PageRank, PersonRank, Resonance, etc. to surface the most popular result relevant to a query. This approach dominated the Web 1.0 era before the advent of the social web. Popular – Serendipity Quadrant Services in this category help you find the most popular content being shared online across different social networks. These were the next to evolve in the Web 2.0 era, beginning with social bookmarking services like Reddit, StumbleUpon, etc. There is an element of personalization provided by many of these, in that you “follow” some users, but the motive behind such following is less to seek personalized content, more to seek trending, viral content. Note how Digg is attempting to move from this quadrant to the personalized quadrant, and facing hurdles along the way. Search – Personalized Quadrant A breed of services has evolved around delivering personalized recommendations and content tailored for your needs. Hunch learns about you and acts as a “taste engine”, while Blekko allows you to personalize your searches with slashtags. Google is making forays in this space with its Social Search service, which tries to personalize search results based on your social graph. Personalized Serendipity Quadrant This is the hottest space where most of the competition is today. Twitter Lists are personalized (created by you) and deliver fresh, serendipitous content relevant to your interests. Facebook Likes give you serendipitous discovery from your personal friends. Flipboard provides a social magazine based on your personal social circle on Facebook and Twitter. My6sense delivers new content using ‘Digital Intuition’. Vertical networks like Last.fm deliver music recommendations based on your individual taste. Personalized Twitter newspapers give you fresh content filtered by your social graph on Twitter. Note how Datasift lies at the center of the matrix. This is because Datasift is a platform providing different filtering services and approaches. Developers may use the platform to develop different services and apps that can lie in any of these quadrants. How does FORMAT help? So what is the point of this exercise? Using FORMAT:

We see the big picture of how services providing relevance and filtering are evolving. We see how personalized serendipity is the holy grail of the social web right now. We see how different services relate to each other and who is competing with whom and how. We see how identifying the target quadrant is important for any new startup in this space. We see how users provide friction when a service tries to change quadrants (Digg).

If you are involved in a startup aiming to provide filtered, relevant content to users, which quadrant would you target? See how FORMAT helps?

]]>
Thu, 02 Sep 2010 06:44:00 +0200 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SkepticGeek/~3/hr3w021ROYs/
Sony Acts Like Sony, Announces Music Streaming Service http://sweetcron.binaryisdeath.de/items/view/4672 I love how Sony pretty much ignores the rest of the world, and does whatever they want. Take memory cards for example. Rather then use the industry standard compact flash or SD cards, Sony creates a new format in the memory stick. No one but Sony uses it, and they continue to use the memory stick to this day. Sometimes, admittedly, they win (Blu-ray) and sometimes they lose (Betamax), but they are never afraid to ignore what other people have done and do their own thing.

That brings us back to the latest example of Sony’s particular brand of crazy: music streaming. Despite the fact that there are other perfectly good music streaming applications out there, Sony has created one of their own. The new service, called Music Unlimited, is designed to work with many of Sony’s existing products to provide access to millions of stored tracks via the internet. I can’t really see a widespread adoption of Music Unlimited, unless they make it the only option to purchasers of their products. Sony announced this new service last night at the IFA show, just hours before Apple announced their latest and greatest. Brilliant. [via DeepTech]

]]>
Thu, 02 Sep 2010 02:00:00 +0200 http://www.crunchgear.com/2010/09/01/sony-acts-like-sony-announces-music-streaming-service/
Amazon streaming 99-cent ABC and Fox shows... right now http://sweetcron.binaryisdeath.de/items/view/4665 Eager to get on the new Apple TV's cheap 99-cent TV show rentals but not so pumped to wait four weeks for it to ship? No worries: Amazon's also now offering 99-cent rentals of various ABC and FOX shows, which means a whole host of Amazon VOD-compatible devices just got some cheaper streaming options as well -- and hey, Roku just cut prices on its entire lineup of Amazon- and Netflix- compatible players, so you can get in the game for as little as $60. Of course, the Apple TV also features day-and-date movie rentals, local streaming, AirPlay, and that slick iPhone / iPod touch Remote app, but only your heart truly knows if those are worth an extra few bucks and a month of fevered desire.

[Thanks, Stephen]Amazon streaming 99-cent ABC and Fox shows... right now originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 01 Sep 2010 17:28:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.Permalink | Email this | Comments

]]>
Thu, 02 Sep 2010 00:28:00 +0200 http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/01/amazon-streaming-99-cent-abc-and-fox-shows-right-now/
Apple TV vs. the competition -- how does it stack up? http://sweetcron.binaryisdeath.de/items/view/4670 Although it's only just been revealed and won't actually go on sale for four long weeks, Apple's new hockey puck is far from the only media streamer on the market -- and with Sony's Netbox and the Boxee Box on the way, the sub-$200 set-top box market is exploding with options. So let's line up the revised Apple TV against the (post-price cut) Roku HD-XR, Popbox, and even an LG Blu-ray player in the same price range and see what you're actually getting -- and more importantly, getting access to -- on each device. Oh, and there's some choice words from Roku after the break.

Update: You asked for them, so we added the PS3, Xbox 360 & WDTV Live as well, after the break.

        Device:
        AppleTV
        Roku XR
        Pop Box
        LG BD550









        Price:
        $99
        $99
        $129
        $130 - $150


        Form Factor/Size:
        3.9 x 0.9 x 3.9
        5 x 5 x 1.75
        8 x 1.4 x 6 inches
        16.9 x 1.8 x 7.9


        Available Content:
        HD TV shows from ABC &amp; Fox ($0.99), HD Movie rentals ($4.99/$3.99), Netflix, iTunes, YouTube
        Netflix, Amazon VOD (now with $0.99 HD TV show purchases from Fox &amp; ABC), MLB.tv, UFC, NBA GameTime, YouTube, Pandora
        YouTube, Revision3, Blip.tv, h.264 / XviD / MPEG-4, MKV / AVI / WMV
        Blu-ray discs, VUDU, Netflix, CinemaNow, YouTube, Pandora, Napster


        Apps / SDK:
        N/A
        Roku Channel / SDK available
        Popapps Store / SDK available
        NetCast widgets


        Connectivity:
        WiFi N, Ethernet
        WiFi N, Ethernet
        Ethernet, optional WiFi adapter
        Ethernet, Disc


        Video Quality:
        720p, 5.1 audio
        720p (1080p upgrade coming soon), 5.1 audio
        1080p, 5.1 audio
        1080p, 7.1 audio, DTS-HD MA / Dolby TrueHD audio

Continue reading Apple TV vs. the competition -- how does it stack up?Apple TV vs. the competition -- how does it stack up? originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 01 Sep 2010 18:14:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

]]>
Thu, 02 Sep 2010 00:14:00 +0200 http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~3/DGWKog6G1DY/
Amazon Unveils $.99 Fox And ABC TV Show Purchases. Apple Fanboys say wha? http://sweetcron.binaryisdeath.de/items/view/4666 Whoa, this came out of left-field. Amazon just announced that its Video on demand service will be serving up $.99 ABC and Fox purchasesjust like Apple. However, it’s not just limited to one platform as Amazon Video on demand is widely available a bunch of products. This could be huge and might take some sales away from the new Apple TV. Steve touted the new $.99 rentals as one of the main features of the Apple TV and I couldn’t agree more. It’s a relatively cheap and easy way to watch a few TV shows. It almost makes since if you’re not a big TV watch to opt for the pay-per-view scheme rather than a pricey cable subscription — 22 episodes in a season = $22. However, it could get expensive and you don’t even end up owning the content. Amazon’s solution, however, is just about the same thing with the primary difference that users are actually buying the episode for the same price that Apple is renting them. The cool part is that you may already have the capability as Amazon Video on demand is found in dozens of HDTVs from Samsung, Sony, and Panasonic, set top boxes like TiVo, and yes, even the Roku. I’m still seeing a $2.99 price via my TiVo HD, but that will likely drop to the new price before too long. Of course the Apple TV brings other features to the table that avid Apple users will no doubt enjoy, but this move from Amazon should make some consumer look closely at their current equipment before dropping $99 on the new streamer. I count three devices in my house with Amazon Video on demand.

]]>
Thu, 02 Sep 2010 00:02:00 +0200 http://www.crunchgear.com/2010/09/01/amazon-unveils-99-fox-and-abc-tv-show-rentals-apple-fanboys-say-wha/
I'm at Coworking Cologne (Deutz-Mülheimer Straße 129, Cologne). <a href="http://4sq.com/9nJqrb" rel="external">http://4sq.com/9nJqrb</a> http://sweetcron.binaryisdeath.de/items/view/4663 Wed, 01 Sep 2010 18:54:00 +0200 http://twitter.com/guttertec/statuses/22723746376 Only a couples of day until Berlin School is gonna start… #curious http://sweetcron.binaryisdeath.de/items/view/4661 Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:42:00 +0200 http://twitter.com/guttertec/statuses/22699704043 LG to introduce “Smart TV” concept at IFA http://sweetcron.binaryisdeath.de/items/view/4659 LG’s SMART TV is LG approach to mix both Internet Content and TV. The obvious application will be for you to access to basic internet services like YouTube, Picasa, Yahoo! Yahoo! News, AccuWeather.com, but also SNS services like FaceBook, Twitter and many other widgets or games (Shopping, Yoga, Horoscope) from the comfort of you Sofa. This “SMART TV” will also feature a new “Magic Motion Remote” some kind of Hybrid WiiMote, in order to let you easily access to any data and even play games with ...

]]>
Wed, 01 Sep 2010 06:44:00 +0200 http://en.akihabaranews.com/59102/none/lg-to-introduce-%E2%80%9Csmart-tv%E2%80%9D-concept-at-ifa?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=lg-to-introduce-%25e2%2580%259csmart-tv%25e2%2580%259d-concept-at-ifa
Is Amazon Looking to Rumble With Netflix? http://sweetcron.binaryisdeath.de/items/view/4660 Because we do not know what this service might look like, here is a picture of the Amazon river.

TV and film streaming on a subscription basis has been Netflix’s turf for a while now (sorry, Blockbuster). But Amazon may be looking to change that, according to sources speaking anonymously to the Wall Street Journal.

The Journal reports that Amazon has been proposing a web-based subscription service for TV shows and movies to a bunch of media companies, including NBC, Time Warner and Viacom. The service would be viewable on the web as well as through devices like the Xbox, Roku and Internet-ready TVs.

At least one version of the proposal suggested that the offering might be bundled with the Amazon Prime service. That subscriber base would consist of people who give Amazon $79 a year for free two-day delivery on physical media — i.e., not exactly the audience you’d imagine as early adopters of a streaming video service — but it would help them launch with a bang.

This would be on top of Amazon’s current VOD service, which we thought might have been planning a redesign due to some recent job postings for designers. But a new streaming service would also potentially explain this.

One ironic twist in this potential faceoff between Amazon and Netflix is that Netflix relies on Amazon’s cloud services to power its website and recommendations engine. Anyone want to place their bets now?

Photo courtesy of Flickr user markg6.

Related GigaOm Pro Content (subscription required): Three Reasons Over-The-Top TV Apps Will Beat Big-Cable

]]>
Wed, 01 Sep 2010 03:00:00 +0200 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/newteevee/~3/wh-5L4hZjsQ/
10 Ways People Find Relevant Information http://sweetcron.binaryisdeath.de/items/view/4658 Louis Gray has a dynamite post today listing his view of what the 5 ways people find relevant information are.  He missed some, which I will add to my list, but this is a valuable list.  In fairness, I’m not sure Louis sees this list as extending to search, he is focused on filtering what we already have, but I think search goes hand in hand with the process and fits very naturally.  You can tell because it’s easy to imagine combining some or all of these techniques to improve search and filtering for some specific problem. This is important because having an exhaustive taxonomy or framework is the first step in analyzing or gaming what’s going on.  Here are the different ways people find relevant information (the first 5 are from Gray’s post): 1.  Editorial Filtering.  Some expert is nominated who will tell you what’s important.  You follow that expert because you like their choices, or you just want the comfort of knowing those are the choices of an expert.  This has to be one of the earliest mechanisms and one we still see very commonly.   The New York Times is a great example of Expert Filtering. 2.  Global Popularity Filtering.  If a lot of people like a thing, it must be a good thing.  This one is just as old if not older than Editorial Filtering.  Examples are all around us ranging from our system of Government (though they sure can make themselves unpopular at times!) to American Idol.  Online services frequently present ranked listings based on popularity.  3.  Social Filtering:  If my friends liked it, I probably will too.  Hey, this is what Facebook is all about. 4.  Explicit Personalization:  Tell us what you like and don’t like and we’ll use that to help filter.  Netflix and Amazon want you to rate what you have already consumed.  They use that information to find new things you will like. 5.  Implicit Personalization:  We will watch you and infer what you like.  In Amazon, “people who like this book also bought these books.” 6.  Keyword Filtering:  If the same words are used with the same frequency as something you like, the words probably describe something else you like.  Hey, that’s the life of a Search Engine. 7.   Crowdsourced Filtering:  Get on a forum and ask peeps what they think.  These are not necessarily your friends.  Anyone on the forum can answer.  Hopefully the place you’ve chosen is frequented by people who are more likely to know your kind of answers than a random person selected off the street.  I really like StackOverflow for programming-related questions, for example. 8.  Location Filtering:  Geolocation is big these days.  We can assume you are where you are for a reason.  Maybe knowing where you are helps us filter certain kinds of information.  Yelp is a beautiful thing for that reason. 9.  Demographic Filtering:  This is a very old mechanism for marketers to use when targeting, and often it is the first thing they reach for.  It’s effectiveness is surpisingly limited (Explicit and Implicit personalization can be as much as 10x more predictive, for example) but it can add value.  Demographics include age, sex, ethnic background, and the region you live in.  Dell wanting to know whether you want a computer for home use, small business, big business, or whatever is their way of trying to apply a little bit of demographic filtering to help you find what you want. 10.  Link Network Filtering:  If the Internet has taken the time to create links to a particular answer of some kind, it is probably a better answer.  This one is clearly related to some of the others, but I wanted to call it out on its own simply because of the importance of things like Google Page Rank and Retweets.  These are subtley different than a pure popularity score, for example.  One difference is people have to work harder to make their input known.  They may have to create a web site with links to the content, for example.  Another is that this type of relevance weighting usually requires a fair amount of analysis to collect.  Popularity contests are usually very obvious and up front.  Perhaps this could be referred to as implicit popularity too, or reference to authority. There are probably other methods, but this is a strong set.  What can we do with it?  Product designers can ask themselves whether their product benefits from the addition of one or more.  That’s cool.  One I am more fascinated with is Marketing.  At its heart, marketing is the art of getting on people’s radar screens and passing muster once on the radar as something they have to have.  At a level of abstraction, this means gaming their information filtering strategies to a greater or lesser extent.  I think it would make a fascinating marketing offsite to take the list of 10 and go figure out how to move the needle in a favorable direction for each and every one of them.  Don’t think it’s important?  Don’t think it’s marketing? Consider that SEO is basically the process of gaming Keyword Filtering and Link Network Filtering.  If you don’t think SEO is important to marketers, I can’t help you.  But one thing I believe wholeheartedly is that efficient marketing is the process of finding ways to market that are different.  When everyone is marketing in exactly the same way (i.e. using exactly the same channel to send the message and sending very similar messages), the noise level is just too high.  What if, during the course of that offsite, you discover that for your market some of these filtering mechanisms are hardly being considered and its pretty straightforward to walk right in that door? Just to help with understanding, here is the linkage between the 10 and various kinds of marketing: -  Keyword Filtering + Link Filtering = SEO -  Editorial Filtering = PR -  Global Popularity Filtering:  Sometimes I think this is all simple-minded marketing thinks about.  Yeah, we want to be popular, we want to be cool! -  Social Filtering:  Of course Social Media marketing goes here.  But so do referral programs.  How can you get friends to tell friends they gotta have your product. -  Explicit Personalization:  Can you get prospects to qualify themselves in some way?  Is there a referral service for your industry that asks a series of key questions and then suggests products that fit the answers?  And what is the impact of saying, “We don’t think you’re a customer.”  No Soup for You may just increase the appetite for it, oddly enough. -  Implicit Personalization:  Targeting like-minded people is an old marketing technique.  You must have sat around a table discussing where your customers like to get their information, their likes and dislikes, and how to find more people just like that. -  Crowdsourced Filtering:  This is a fascinating area that I’ve had a lot of experience with.  If you frequent social forums, there are people in them all the time asking for advice on what to buy.  It is rare that you see companies responding there, yet if it’s done tastefully and without being too pushy, it can be very effective.  Do you have a strategy to cover those venues?  Do you have a strategy to convince your customers to speak up for you in those venues? -  Demographics:  I won’t teach you how to suck eggs.  Marketers have been focused on demographics for ages. -  Location:  Does your business depend on location?  It’s a function of walk-in traffic.  If you depend on it, you have to avail yourself of every possible means of getting on the radar based on location.  So there you have it.  A nice cut at a taxonomy for filtering information by relevance.  Doing that job better than anyone and monetizing it is what made Google successful.  Figure out how to make sure you’re successful at it too. Thanks Louis for the post!

]]>
Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:31:00 +0200 http://smoothspan.wordpress.com/2010/08/31/6-ways-people-find-relevant-information/
RT @3DPrintingNow: RepRap Controls Laser: RepRap motherboard controlling my laser cutter. The intent is to add 3D printing to the las... ... http://sweetcron.binaryisdeath.de/items/view/4657 Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:19:00 +0200 http://twitter.com/guttertec/statuses/22595948616 RT @roitsch: This is one of the most outstanding flickr sets I've ever seen: <a href="http://bit.ly/95mddh" rel="external">http://bit.ly/95mddh</a> http://sweetcron.binaryisdeath.de/items/view/4652 Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:32:00 +0200 http://twitter.com/guttertec/statuses/22557866380 Fullscreen and more! http://sweetcron.binaryisdeath.de/items/view/4653 As Google Reader is all about reading, we thought we should give our users a chance to maximize their screen space whenever possible... thus fullscreen mode was born. You can toggle the fullscreen mode through the 'f' key. Additionally, you can use 'shift + u' to show and hide the navigation panel so you can easily change what you're reading without leaving fullscreen mode.

Eagle-eyed viewers might have also noticed we've added a new category to the trends page: clicked trends - now you can see which sources you click on the most. And finally, something many of you have asked for before...we now show you your lifetime read item count. That's right. Every. Single.* Item.**

*Only things you've scrolled by, or clicked on - doesn't count mark all as read. **Okay, that's not quite accurate - once you hit around 300K (which we know some of you are already over) we stop counting for performance reasons. Consider that "beating the game".

]]>
Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:57:00 +0200 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/dtKx/~3/8Yu3n1PdZq8/fullscreen-and-more.html
On my way to #dingfabrik to hold a talk about Cognitive Cities http://sweetcron.binaryisdeath.de/items/view/4650 Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:44:00 +0200 http://twitter.com/guttertec/statuses/22539340502 Google Chrome Shows Off What HTML5 Can Do With Arcade Fire Video http://sweetcron.binaryisdeath.de/items/view/4674 Google is a big proponent of HTML5, especially for video and rich graphics in the browser. To show off what HTML5 can do, Google Chrome teamed up with the Arcade Fire and director Chris Milk to create a custom interactive video for their song, “We Used To Wait.” The experience is called The Wilderness Downtown and is best viewed in Chrome or other HTML5-compliant browser. You start by typing in the address of the house you grew up in, then it loads a video of a guy in a hoodie running through the streets. Different windows pop open on your screen, some with graphics, some with videos. Google Maps and Street View images of your old neighborhood are incorporated into the video. All the video is in HTML5, different windows open up triggered by the music, and you even see a fly-over of your neighborhood based on Google Maps’ routing API. The graphics are pretty impressive too. Shadows of birds are superimposed over the Google Maps birds-eye view of your neighborhood, and animated trees are plopped into the street using the Street View image and some boundary detection software. You can also write a note to your former self in a beautiful tree-root font or draw a picture, all using HTML5 font and drawing tools. These notes and drawing will be used in future Arcade Fire concerts. The video is almost as cool as playing Quake in your browser. Except that it is very processor-intensive, and it suggests that you close all other tabs and quit other programs before starting. But that’s why it’s called an experiment.

CrunchBase InformationGoogle ChromeInformation provided by CrunchBase

]]>
Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:05:00 +0200 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/iyUn3Nk9GP4/
Der Nachrichtensammler http://sweetcron.binaryisdeath.de/items/view/4654 Wie an anderer Stelle bereits erwähnt: ich glaube, die größte Veränderung, die das Internet für etablierte Publikationsformen bringt, ist der Dialog. Leser werden zu Nutzern, sie beteiligen sich als aktive Rezipienten am Kommunikationsprozess. Ich glaube, dass diese Veränderung bedeutsamer ist als all die technischen Prozesse, die wir im Netz erleben. Denn der aktive Rezipient kommuniziert nicht nur in Kommentaren, er nutzt die Medieninhalte vor allem weiter, verlinkt und verschickt sie. Facebook und Twitter basieren auf diesem Verhalten und werden so zu Nachrichtenquellen. Die Behauptung, dass eine Nachricht, wenn sie denn wichtig ist, mich schon erreichen wird, basiert darauf, dass meine Freunde zu Sendern werden, die Links und Informationen (mit mir) teilen. Dadurch verwischt die klare Trennung zwischen harten und weichen Nachrichten, private und öffentliche Meldungen werden auf gleicher Ebene wahrgenommen und die Zusammenstellung von News wird individualisiert. In dem lesenswerten Beitrag How News Consumption is Shifting to the Personalized Social News Stream bei mashable werden weitere Folgen dieser Entwicklung dargelegt. Darin wird unter anderem eine Mitarbeiter des amerikanischen National Public Radio zitiert, der in einer Umfrage folgendes Ergebnis zu Tage gefördert hat. “It’s not that people have lost interest in the news, it’s that they have shifted platforms”

Eine Plattform, die sich zum Finden, Sammeln und Aufbereiten von Nachrichten eignet ist das ausreichnd bejubelte Flipboard, das leider auf die iPhone nicht funktioniert, weshalb ich die Jubelarien nur aus zweiter Hand weiter geben kann. Nicht nur auf dem iPhone, sondern auch mit einer Android-App kommt Pulse daher, das für 1,59 Euro auch auf dem iPhone funktioniert. Und zwar so:

ShareThisWeitere Digitale Notizen zum ThemaDer Einfluß der Echtzeit-MedienWhy Privacy is not deadBeziehungsstatus ändern

]]>
Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:21:00 +0200 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/dirkvongehlen/~3/yx6Qi_NaNiQ/